Although one of the most iconic dinosaurs, Brontosaurus has long been considered misclassified. In fact, for decades, scientists have believed that the Brontosaurus was actually an Apatosaurus.

Now, an exhaustive new study by paleontologists from provides conclusive evidence that Brontosaurus is distinct from Apatosaurus, and as such, can now be reinstated as its own unique genus.

Brontosaurus artistic reconstruction

The iconic long-necked dinosaur was not Apatosaurus after all

Brontosaurus is one of the most charismatic dinosaurs of all time, inspiring generations of children, thanks to its size and evocative name. However, as every armchair paleontologist knows, Brontosaurus was in fact a misnomer, and it should be correctly referred to as Apatosaurus.

At least, this is what scientists have believed since 1903, when it was decided that the differences between Brontosaurus excelsus and Apatosaurus were so minor that it was better to put them both in the same genus. Because Apatosaurus was named first, it was the one that was used under the rules of scientific naming.

In fact, of course, the Brontosaurus was never really gone — it was simply treated as a species of the genus Apatosaurus: Apatosaurus excelsus. So, while scientists thought the genus Brontosaurus was the same as Apatosaurus, they always agreed that the species excelsus was different from other Apatosaurus species.

Now, paleontologists Emanuel Tschopp, Octávio Mateus, and Roger Benson say that Brontosaurus was a unique genus all along. But let’s start from the beginning.

Brontosaurus history

The history of Brontosaurus is complex, and one of the most intriguing stories in science. In the 1870s, the Western United States formed the location for dozens of new finds of fossil species, most notably of dinosaurs.

Field crews excavated numerous new skeletons mostly for the famous and influential paleontologists Marsh and Cope. During that period, Marsh’s team discovered two enormous, partial skeletons of long-necked dinosaurs and shipped them to the Yale Peabody Museum in New Haven, where Marsh worked. Marsh described the first of these skeletons as Apatosaurus ajax, the “deceptive lizard” after the Greek hero Ajax. Two years later, he named the second skeleton Brontosaurus excelsus, the “noble thunder lizard.”

>> See the history of this find: The giant Brontosaurus in Central Park (1905)

(Article continues below ad)

However, because neither of the skeletons were found with a skull, Marsh reconstructed one for Brontosaurus excelsus. Brontosaurus was a massive animal, like Apatosaurus, and like another long-necked dinosaur from the Western United States,Camarasaurus. Because of this similarity, it seemed logical at the time that Brontosaurus had a similarly stout, box-like skull to that of Camarasaurus. However, this reconstruction was later found to be wrong.

Shortly after Marsh’s death, a team from the Field Museum of Chicago found another skeleton similar to both Apatosaurus ajax and Brontosaurus excelsus. In fact, this skeleton was intermediate in shape in many aspects. Therefore, palaeontologists thought that Brontosaurus excelsus was actually so similar to Apatosaurus ajax that it would be more correct to treat them as two different species of the same genus.

It was the second extinction of Brontosaurus — a scientific one: from now on, Brontosaurus excelsus became known as Apatosaurus excelsus and the name Brontosaurus was not considered scientifically valid any more.

The final blow to “Brontosaurus” happened in the 1970s, when researchers showed that Apatosaurus was not closely related to Camarasaurus, but to yet another dinosaur from the same area: Diplodocus. Because Diplodocus had a slender, horse-like skull, Apatosaurus and thus also “Brontosaurus” must have had a skull more similar to Diplodocus instead of toCamarasaurus – and so the popular, but untrue myth about “Brontosaurus” being an Apatosaurus with the wrong head was born.

Brontosaurus infographics

The thunder lizard is back!

But now, in a new study published in the peer reviewed open access journal PeerJ and consisting of almost 300 pages of evidence, a team of scientists from Portugal and the UK have shown that Brontosaurus was distinct from Apatosaurus after all – the thunder lizard is back!

How can a single study overthrow more than a century of research? “Our research would not have been possible at this level of detail 15 or more years ago”, explains Emanuel Tschopp, a Swiss national who led the study during his PhD at Universidade Nova de Lisboa in Portugal, “in fact, until very recently, the claim that Brontosaurus was the same as Apatosaurus was completely reasonable, based on the knowledge we had.”

It is only with numerous new findings of dinosaurs similar to Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus in recent years that it has become possible to undertake a detailed reinvestigation of how different they actually were. In science, the distinction between species and genera is without clear rules.

Brontosaurus: Resurrected

Does this mean that the decision to resurrect Brontosaurus is just a matter of personal preference?

“Not at all,” explains Tschopp, “we tried to be as objective as possible whenever making a decision which would differentiate between species and genus.”

The researchers applied statistical approaches to calculate the differences between other species and genera of diplodocid dinosaurs, and were surprised by the result. ”

The differences we found between Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus were at least as numerous as the ones between other closely related genera, and much more than what you normally find between species,” explains Roger Benson, a co-author from the University of Oxford.

Therefore, Tschopp and colleagues have concluded that it is now possible to resurrect Brontosaurus as a genus distinct from Apatosaurus. “It’s the classic example of how science works,” says Professor Mateus, a collaborator on the research. “Especially when hypotheses are based on fragmentary fossils, it is possible for new finds to overthrow years of research.”

Science is a process, always moving towards a clearer picture of the world around us. Sometimes this also means that we have to step backwards a bit before we continue to advance. That’s what keeps the curiosity going.

Hence, it is fitting that the Brontosaurus which sparked the curiosity of millions of people worldwide has now returned to do so again.

Historic life restoration of Brontosaurus as semi-acquatic animal


See books created by our team in the Myria shop!


About The Author

The Myria Editors

Myria, originally launched in 1998, strives to deliver more conversation, and less gossip. More intelligence, less eye-rolling. More acceptance, less judgment. And throughout the site: more needle, less haystack. Through life's ups, downs, and everything in between, we want to encourage you, support you, and help guide you. The team behind Myria understands that status updates and selfies never tell the whole story, and that we all have stuff to deal with, and that's nothing you need to hide here. Beyond "been there, done that" - every day, we're still there and still doing it. That's how we know: You've got this.


Photo credit(s): Brontosaurus artistic reconstruction (Credits: Davide Bonadonna, Creative commons license CC- BY NC SA); Historic life restoration of Brontosaurus as semi-acquatic animal, and with Diplodocus in the background on land (by Charles R Knight, 1897)

Original publication date: April 7, 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This
Read previous post:
5 ways you can help your child find a best friend

Best friends are rare, and they're important... and they seem to be becoming a rare breed, indeed.

Close